dc.contributor.author |
Perrick, Michael |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-07-24T11:46:21Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-07-24T11:46:21Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Open Journal of Philosophy, 2016, 6, 446-454 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2163-9442 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.64042 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2018 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Appearances notwithstanding, in this paper we do not discuss the Gettier problem.
The question at issue is whether one can be justified in believing a false proposition.
So, what is at stake is the relation between justified belief and falseness. In his famous
paper, Gettier presupposes explicitly that one can be justified in believing a false
proposition (Gettier’s “first point”). He makes essential use of this point in arguing
for his well-known Gettier cases. I will prove that this point, in Gettier’s robust reading,
is untenable since it leads to incompatible or contradictory consequences. It is
only in a much weaker sense than we find in Gettier’s paper that it seems possible to
be justified in believing a false proposition. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Scientific Research |
en_US |
dc.subject |
False Belief |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Gettier |
en_US |
dc.title |
Justification and False Belief: Gettier’s First Point |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |