DSpace Repository

Justification and False Belief: Gettier’s First Point

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Perrick, Michael
dc.date.accessioned 2018-07-24T11:46:21Z
dc.date.available 2018-07-24T11:46:21Z
dc.date.issued 2016-11
dc.identifier.citation Open Journal of Philosophy, 2016, 6, 446-454 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2163-9442
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.64042
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2018
dc.description.abstract Appearances notwithstanding, in this paper we do not discuss the Gettier problem. The question at issue is whether one can be justified in believing a false proposition. So, what is at stake is the relation between justified belief and falseness. In his famous paper, Gettier presupposes explicitly that one can be justified in believing a false proposition (Gettier’s “first point”). He makes essential use of this point in arguing for his well-known Gettier cases. I will prove that this point, in Gettier’s robust reading, is untenable since it leads to incompatible or contradictory consequences. It is only in a much weaker sense than we find in Gettier’s paper that it seems possible to be justified in believing a false proposition. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Scientific Research en_US
dc.subject False Belief en_US
dc.subject Gettier en_US
dc.title Justification and False Belief: Gettier’s First Point en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account