Abstract:
Plant-based transportation fuels were the focus of extended criticism in the
press, especially during 2008 when a portion of the blame for a spike in global food prices
was associated with growth of the United States’ corn ethanol industry. The critique is
based on an unsophisticated portrayal of the ethical issues at stake in the food security
implications of biofuel. Three ethical critiques can be leveled at the food vs. fuel debate.
First, although market drivers of biofuels indeed skew consumption of agricultural grains,
this is not a problem that is unique to biofuels. Second, the critique does not reflect an
adequate understanding of the way that rising food prices and changes in agricultural
technology affect the food security of the poorest people. Third, although rising food prices
could be beneficial to poor farm producers among the world’s poor, it is unlikely that
benefits will materialize in the absence of concerted programs to deliberately select biofuel
development strategies that are targeted to strengthen food security for poor and
small-holding producers. An adequate agricultural ethics for biofuels will require
commitment by both private and public sector biofuel developers to ensure that potentially
positive attributes of biofuel development are realized
