dc.contributor.author |
Künzler, Daniel |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-06-02T07:27:55Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-06-02T07:27:55Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-05 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
1. In 2012, this culminated in the adoption of the ILO Recommendation concerning national floors of social protection |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12095 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1452 |
|
dc.description |
full text |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
With social security provisions in Kenya remainingunder-reported in the more recent literature, this overviewcovers recent reforms in key areas of the country’ s social secu-rity system. In the health sector and in old-age pension provi-sion social security is still mainly workerist (biased towardthose in formal employment), and attempts to expand cove-rage have had limited effect only – cash transfer programmes,for instance, have been expanded but in practice they do notuniversally cover the entitled categories. Thus, although theKenyan social security system now has a considerable pro-poor social assistance component it remains biased towardthose in formal employment, to the benefit of the highest in-come quintile. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Fribourg, Department of Social Sciences, Switzerland |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
International Social Security Review, Vol. 69, 1/2016;69, 1/2016 |
|
dc.subject |
coverage, social policy, provident fund, socialinsurance, social assistance, Kenya, Africa |
en_US |
dc.title |
Social security reforms in Kenya: Towards a workeristor a citizenship-based system? |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |